Quality and outcomes of maternal and perinatal care for 76,563 pregnancies reported in a nationwide network of Nigerian referral-level hospitals.

Background: The WHO in collaboration with the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, established a nationwide electronic data platform across referral-level hospitals. We report the burden of maternal, foetal and neonatal complications and quality and outcomes of care during the first year. Methods: Data were analysed from 76,563 women who were admitted for delivery or on account of complications within 42 days of delivery or termination of pregnancy from September 2019 to August 2020 across the 54 hospitals included in the Maternal and Perinatal Database for Quality, Equity and Dignity programme. Findings: Participating hospitals reported 69,055 live births, 4,498 stillbirths and 1,090 early neonatal deaths. 44,614 women (58·3%) had at least one pregnancy complication, out of which 6,618 women (8·6%) met our criteria for potentially life-threatening complications, and 940 women (1·2%) died. Leading causes of maternal death were eclampsia (n = 187,20·6%), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (n = 103,11·4%), and sepsis (n = 99,10·8%). Antepartum hypoxia (n = 1455,31·1%) and acute intrapartum events (n = 913,19·6%) were the leading causes of perinatal death. Predictors of maternal and perinatal death were similar: low maternal education, lack of antenatal care, referral from other facility, previous caesarean section, latent-phase labour admission, operative vaginal birth, non-use of a labour monitoring tool, no labour companion, and non-use of uterotonic for PPH prevention. Interpretation: This nationwide programme for routine data aggregation shows that maternal and perinatal mortality reduction strategies in Nigeria require a multisectoral approach. Several lives could be saved in the short term by addressing key predictors of death, including gaps in the coverage of internationally recommended interventions such as companionship in labour and use of labour monitoring tool. Funding: This work was funded by MSD for Mothers; and UNDP/UNFPA/ UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a co-sponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO).

The efficacy of pentazocine + diclofenac versus paracetamol + diclofenac for post- caesarean section analgesia.

BACKGROUND: The most common major obstetric procedure is caesarean section (CS) and one of the greatest concerns for women after CS is to have optimal pain relief. AIM: This study aims to compare the efficacy of pentazocine + diclofenac and paracetamol + diclofenac on post-operative analgesia after CS. METHODOLOGY: This was a single-blind, randomised trial. Pregnant women that had CS were randomized into two groups. Group A received intramuscular pentazocine + rectal diclofenac postoperatively. Group B received intramuscular paracetamol + rectal diclofenac postoperatively. Post-operative pain was assessed by numeric rating scale at 1 h after the surgery, at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. The result obtained was analysed using SPSS Version 22 and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The median pain scores in both groups ranged from 2 to 3 across all periods of assessment. The pain relief was slightly better in the pentazocine + diclofenac group with no significant difference in the pain score between the two groups at all periods of assessment. The satisfaction level was good in 66.3% and 69.5% of the participants in the pentazocine + diclofenac and paracetamol + diclofenac group respectively but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 4.14, P = 0. 12). Nausea, vomiting and drowsiness were significantly more in the pentazocine + diclofenac combination (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both combination of analgesics provided adequate analgesia but pentazocine + diclofenac combination had better pain relief but was more associated with side effects.

Place of delivery among women who had antenatal care in a teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of antenatal care services does not necessarily equate to delivery at the health facility. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of pregnant women who had antenatal care and delivered in the hospital and the reasons for delivery elsewhere. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pregnant women of low risk who initiated antenatal care at the University Teaching Hospital were recruited consecutively from January to June 2004 and longitudinally followed up until delivery. A two-part questionnaire was used to obtain information on biosocial data, place of delivery, accoucher, fetomaternal outcome, and reason(s) for delivery elsewhere. RESULTS: Of the 1,080 women studied, 740 (68.5%) delivered in the hospital while 340 (31.5%) delivered elsewhere. The majority (52) of the deliveries elsewhere were at the woman's home. There were more literate women amongst the hospital delivery group, while there were more women of high parity and with a previous home birth in the home delivery group (p<0.05). Fetomaternal outcomes were similar in both groups. Nurses/midwives conducted most (60%) of the home deliveries and the principal reasons for home births were privacy and lack of transport during labor. CONCLUSION: 68.5% of women who had uneventful antenatal care delivered in the hospital. Home delivery was the commonest site for delivery elsewhere and the main reasons were privacy and lack of transportation. Skilled attendants conducted most of the home deliveries with good fetomaternal outcome. There might be a need to encourage women during antenatal care to reach out for skilled attendants when home delivery becomes inevitable.